Paper detail

Minimal Overhead ARQ Sharing Strategies for URLLC in Multi-Hop Networks

The problem of achieving ultra-reliable and low-latency communication (URLLC) in multi-terminal networks has gained traction in the recent past owing to new wireless applications in vehicular networks. In the context of multi-hop networks, which is a classic example for multi-party communication, recent studies have shown that automatic-repeat-request (ARQ) based decode-and-forward (DF) strategies are suitable for URLLC since the idea of distributing a given number of ARQs across the nodes provides fine control on the features of reliability and latency. Inspired by these developments, in this work, we propose a cooperative ARQ sharing strategy for URLLC in multi-hop networks. At the heart of the proposed scheme lies the idea that every node is given the knowledge of the number of ARQs allotted to its preceding node in addition to the ARQs allotted to itself. As a result, each node only needs to count the number of unsuccessful attempts of its preceding node, and then borrow the unused ARQs, thereby improving the reliability feature with no compromise in the latency constraint. Using packet-drop-probability (PDP) as the reliability metric for the proposed cooperative strategy, we formulate an optimization problem of minimizing the PDP subject to a sum constraint on the total number of ARQs allotted across all the nodes. Supported by theoretical analysis on the behavior of PDP, we present low-complexity algorithms to compute near-optimal ARQ distributions for our strategy, and show that our strategy outperforms the existing non-cooperative strategies.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.