Paper detail

Minimal Lepton Flavor Violation Implications of the $b\to s$ Anomalies

The latest measurements of rare $b\to s$ decays in the LHCb experiment have led to results in tension with the predictions of the standard model (SM), including a tentative indication of the violation of lepton flavor universality. Assuming that this situation will persist because of new physics, we explore some of the potential consequences in the context of the SM extended with the seesaw mechanism involving right-handed neutrinos plus effective dimension-six lepton-quark operators under the framework of minimal flavor violation. We focus on a couple of such operators which can accommodate the LHCb anomalies and conform to the minimal flavor violation hypothesis in both their lepton and quark parts. We examine specifically the lepton-flavor-violating decays $B\to K^{(*)}\ell\ell'$, $B_s\toϕ\ell\ell'$, $B\to(π,ρ)\ell\ell'$, and $B_{d,s}\to\ell\ell'$, as well as $K_L\to eμ$ and $K\toπeμ$, induced by such operators. The estimated branching fractions of some of these decay modes with $μτ$ in the final states are allowed by the pertinent experimental constraints to reach a few times $10^{-7}$ if other operators do not yield competitive effects. We also look at the implications for $B\to K^{(*)}νν$ and $K\toπνν$, finding that their rates can be a few times larger than their SM values. These results are testable in future experiments.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.