Paper detail

Minimal Distance to Approximating Noncontextual System as a Measure of Contextuality

Let random vectors $R^c=\{R_p^c:p\in P_c\}$ represent joint measurements of certain subsets $P_c$ of properties $p\in P$ in different contexts $c\in C$. Such a system is traditionally called noncontextual if there exists a jointly distributed set $\{Q_p:p\in P\}$ of random variables such that $R^c$ has the same distribution as $\{Q_p:p\in P_c\}$ for all $c\in C$. A trivial necessary condition for noncontextuality and a precondition for most approaches to measuring contextuality is that the system is consistently connected, i.e., all $R_p^c,R_p^{c'},\dots$ measuring the same property $p$ have the same distribution. The Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) approach allows detecting and measuring "true" contextuality on top of inconsistent connectedness, but at the price of a higher computational cost. In this paper we propose a novel approach to measuring contextuality that shares the generality and basic definitions of the CbD approach and the computational benefits of the previously proposed Negative Probability (NP) approach. The present approach differs from CbD in that instead of considering all possible joints of the double-indexed random variables $R_p^c$, it considers all possible approximating single-indexed systems $\{Q_p:p\in P\}$. The degree of contextuality is defined based on the minimum possible probabilistic distance of the actual measurements $R^c$ from $\{Q_p:p\in P_c$}. We show that the defined measure agrees with a certain measure of contextuality of the CbD approach for all systems where each property enters in exactly two contexts and that this measure can be calculated far more efficiently than the CbD measure and even more efficiently than the NP measure for sufficiently large systems. The present approach can be modified so as to agree with the NP measure of contextuality on all consistently connected systems while extending it to inconsistently connected systems.