Paper detail

Minimal dark matter models with radiative neutrino masses: From Lagrangians to observables

In this master's thesis, the minimal dark matter models with radiative neutrino masses introduced in arXiv:1308.3655 are examined both in general and, using the model T1-3-B ($α= 0$) as a representative, in more detail. In the process, it is both shown how such models are built and a numerical analysis tool chain is established, automating as many steps as possible from the very beginning (deriving the Lagrangian from a given field content) to the very end (calculating observables such as the dark matter relic density, the direct detection cross section and the neutrino masses and mixing matrices). As an important result in laying out the mathematical groundwork, a convention for representations of SU(2) is established which, in this form, is not found in previous works. Another major result is the development of the program minimal-lagrangians, whose capabilities are described in the thesis. It is of great use both for the construction of Lagrangians for new models as well their verification or quick surveys. minimal-lagrangians can be applied to any model within the class it is designed to handle, extending its utility far beyond a one-time result that is only obtained for a single model. Finally, the first steps in the analysis of the model T1-3-B ($α= 0$) are taken. It is shown that the model can reproduce both the singlet-doublet fermion dark matter model and the inert triplet model in the appropriate limits. Moreover, the neutrino mass matrix is found and it is demonstrated that the model can accommodate current constraints on the neutrino masses. Lastly, the behavior of the dark matter relic density as it depends on the parameter responsible for the generation of neutrino masses is investigated. Further in-depth study of the model T1-3-B ($α= 0$) was performed in a separate publication (arXiv:1812.11133).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.