Paper detail

Mind the Gap

We examine the complexity of the online Dictionary Matching with One Gap Problem (DMOG) which is the following. Preprocess a dictionary $D$ of $d$ patterns, where each pattern contains a special gap symbol that can match any string, so that given a text that arrives online, a character at a time, we can report all of the patterns from $D$ that are suffixes of the text that has arrived so far, before the next character arrives. In more general versions the gap symbols are associated with bounds determining the possible lengths of matching strings. Finding efficient algorithmic solutions for (online) DMOG has proven to be a difficult algorithmic challenge. We demonstrate that the difficulty in obtaining efficient solutions for the DMOG problem even, in the offline setting, can be traced back to the infamous 3SUM conjecture. Interestingly, our reduction deviates from the known reduction paths that follow from 3SUM. In particular, most reductions from 3SUM go through the set-disjointness problem, which corresponds to the problem of preprocessing a graph to answer edge-triangles queries. We use a new path of reductions by considering the complementary, although structurally very different, vertex-triangles queries. Using this new path we show a conditional lower bound of $Ω(δ(G_D)+op)$ time per text character, where $G_D$ is a bipartite graph that captures the structure of $D$, $δ(G_D)$ is the degeneracy of this graph, and $op$ is the output size. We also provide matching upper-bounds (up to sub-polynomial factors) for the vertex-triangles problem, and then extend these techniques to the online DMOG problem. In particular, we introduce algorithms whose time cost depends linearly on $δ(G_D)$. Our algorithms make use of graph orientations, together with some additional techniques. Finally, when $δ(G_D)$ is large we are able to obtain even more efficient solutions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.