Paper detail

Mind The Facts: Knowledge-Boosted Coherent Abstractive Text Summarization

Neural models have become successful at producing abstractive summaries that are human-readable and fluent. However, these models have two critical shortcomings: they often don't respect the facts that are either included in the source article or are known to humans as commonsense knowledge, and they don't produce coherent summaries when the source article is long. In this work, we propose a novel architecture that extends Transformer encoder-decoder architecture in order to improve on these shortcomings. First, we incorporate entity-level knowledge from the Wikidata knowledge graph into the encoder-decoder architecture. Injecting structural world knowledge from Wikidata helps our abstractive summarization model to be more fact-aware. Second, we utilize the ideas used in Transformer-XL language model in our proposed encoder-decoder architecture. This helps our model with producing coherent summaries even when the source article is long. We test our model on CNN/Daily Mail summarization dataset and show improvements on ROUGE scores over the baseline Transformer model. We also include model predictions for which our model accurately conveys the facts, while the baseline Transformer model doesn't.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.