Paper detail

Millimeter dust emission compared with other mass estimates in N11 molecular clouds in the LMC

CO and dust emission at millimeter wavelengths are independent tracers of cold interstellar matter, which have seldom been compared on the scale of GMCs in other galaxies. In this study, and for the first time in the Large Magellanic Cloud, we compute the molecular cloud masses from the mm emission of the dust and compare them with the masses derived from their CO luminosity and virial theorem. We present CO (J=1-0,2-1) and 1.2 mm continuum observations of the N11 star forming region in the LMC obtained with the SEST telescope and the SIMBA bolometer, respectively. We use the CO data to identify individual molecular clouds and measure their physical properties. The correlations between the properties of the N11 clouds are in agreement with those found in earlier studies in the LMC that sample a larger set of clouds and a larger range of cloud masses. For the N11 molecular clouds, we compare the masses estimated from the CO luminosity (Xco\Lco), the virial theorem (Mvir) and the millimeter dust luminosity (L_d). The measured ratios Lco/Mvir and L_d/Mvir constrain the Xco and K_d (dust emissivity at 1.2 mm per unit gas mass) parameters as a function of the virial parameter a_vir. The comparison between the different mass estimates yields a Xco-factor of 8.8x10^20 cm-2/(K km s-1) x a_vir and a K_d parameter of 1.5x10^-3 cm2/g x a_vir. We compare our N11 results with a similar analysis for molecular clouds in the Gould's Belt. We do not find in N11 a large discrepancy between the dust mm and virial masses as reported in earlier studies of molecular clouds in the SMC. The ratio between L_d and Mvir in N11 is half of that measured for Gould's Belt clouds, which can be accounted for by a factor of two lower gas-to-dust mass ratio, as the difference in gas metallicities. If the two samples have similar a_vir values, this result implies that their dust far-IR properties are also similar.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.