Paper detail

Milli-arcsecond properties of 10C sources in the Lockman Hole

We have used recent Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) observations by Middelberg et al. with a resolution of $\approx 10$ mas to investigate the properties of faint sources selected from the Tenth Cambridge (10C) survey in the Lockman Hole. The 10C survey is complete to 0.5 mJy at 15.7 GHz and has a resolution of 30 arcsec. We have previously shown that this population is dominated by flat-spectrum sources below $\approx 1$ mJy, in disagreement with several models of the faint, high-frequency sky. We find that 33 out of the 51 10C sources in the VLBI field (65 percent) are detected by the VLBI observations. The sources detected by the VLBI observations must have a high brightness temperature, thus ruling out the possibility that this faint, high frequency population is dominated by starbursting or starforming sources and indicating that they must be Active Galactic Nuclei.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.