Paper detail

Milky Way thin and thick disk kinematics with GAIA EDR3 and RAVE DR5

We present a detailed analysis of kinematics of the Milky Way disk in solar neighborhood using GAIA DR3 catalog. To determine the local kinematics of the stellar disks of the Milky Way galaxy we use a complete sample of 278,228 red giant branch (RGB) stars distributed in a cylinder, centered at the Sun with a 1 kpc radius and half-height of 0.5 kpc. We determine separately the kinematical properties of RGB stars for each Galactic hemisphere in search for possible asymmetries. The kinematical properties of the RGB stars reveal the existence of two kinematically distinct components: the thin disk with mean velocities ${V_R}, {V_ϕ}, {V_Z}$ of about -1, -239, 0 km s$^{-1}$ correspondingly and velocity dispersions $σ_R, σ_ϕ, σ_Z$ of 31, 20 and 11 km s$^{-1}$, and the Thick disk with mean velocities components of about +1, -225, 0 km s$^{-1}$, and velocity dispersions of 49, 35, and 22 km s$^{-1}$. We find that up to 500 pc height above/below the galactic plane, Thick disk stars comprise about half the stars of the disk. Such high amount of RGB stars with Thick disk kinematics points at the secular evolution scenario origin for the Thick disk of the Milky Way galaxy.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.