Paper detail

Migration-Contagion Processes

Consider a migration process based on a closed network of N stations with K_N customers. Each station is a ./M/\infty queue with service (migration) rate mu. Upon departure, a customer is routed at random to another station. In addition to migration, these customers are subject to an SIS (Susceptible, Infected, Susceptible) dynamics: customers are either I for infected, or S for susceptible. They can swap their state either from I to S or from S to I only in stations. At any station, each S customer becomes I with rate alpha Y if there are Y infected customers in the station, and each I customer recovers and becomes S with rate beta. We let N tend to infinity and assume that lim_{N\to infty} K_N/N= eta>0. The main problem is about the set of parameters for which there exists a stationary regime where the epidemic survives in the thermodynamic limit. We establish several structural properties of the system, which allow us to give the phase transition diagram of this thermodynamic limit w.r.t. eta. The analysis of the SIS model reduces to that of a wave-type PDE for which we found no explicit solution. This SIS model is one among several companion stochastic processes with migration and contagion. Two of them are discussed as they provide some bounds and approximations to SIS. These two variants are the DOCS (Departure On Change of State) and the AIR (Averaged Infection Rate), which both admit closed-form solutions. The AIR system is a mean-field model where the infection mechanism is based on the empirical average of the number of infected customers in all stations. The latter admits a product-form solution. DOCS features accelerated migration in that each change of SIS state implies an immediate departure. It leads to another wave-type PDE that admits a closed-form solution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.