Paper detail

Mid-Infrared Emission from Dust around Quiescent Low-Mass X-ray Binaries

We report the discovery of excess 4.5 and 8 micron emission from three quiescent black hole low-mass X-ray binaries, A 0620-00, GS 2023+338, and XTE J1118+480. The mid-infrared emission from GS 2023+338 probably originates in the accretion disk. However, the excess emission from A 0620-00 and XTE J1118+480 is brighter and peaks at longer wavelengths, and so probably originates from circumbinary dust that is heated by the light of the secondary star. We find that the inner edge of the dust distribution lies near 1.7 times the binary separation, which is the minimum radius at which a circumbinary disk would be stable against tidal disruption. The excess infrared emission is not detected at 24 micron, which implies that the dust does not extend beyond about 3 times the binary separation. The total masses of circumbinary material are between 10^22 and 10^24 g. The material could be the remains of fall-back disks produced in supernovae, or material from the companions injected into circumbinary orbits during mass transfer.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.