Paper detail

Mid- and Far-infrared Luminosity Functions and Galaxy Evolution from Multiwavelength Spitzer Observations up to z~2.5

[Abridged]We exploit a large homogeneous dataset to derive a self-consistent picture of IR emission based on the time-dependent 24, 15, 12 and 8micron monochromatic and bolometric IR luminosity functions (LF) over the 0<z<2.5 redshift range. Our analysis is based on the combination of data from deep Spitzer surveys in the VVDS-SWIRE and GOODS areas. To our limiting flux of S(24)=400microJy our derived sample in VVDS-SWIRE includes 1494 sources, and 666 and 904 sources brighter than S(24)=80microJy are catalogued in GOODS-S and GOODS-N, respectively, for a total area of ~0.9 square degs. We obtain reliable optical identifications and redshifts, providing us a rich and robust dataset for our luminosity function determination. Based on the multi-wavelength information available, we constrain the LFs at 8, 12, 15 and 24micron. We also extrapolate total IR luminosities from our best-fit to the observed SEDs of each source, and use this to derive the bolometric LF and comoving volume emissivity up to z~2.5. In the 0<z<1 interval, the bolometric IR luminosity density evolves as (1+z)^3.8+/-0.4. Although more uncertain at higher-z, our results show a flattening of the IR luminosity density at z>1. The mean redshift of the peak in the source number density shifts with luminosity: the brighest IR galaxies appear to be forming stars earlier in cosmic time (z>1.5), while the less luminous ones keep doing it at more recent epochs (z~1 for L(IR)<10^11L_sun). Our results suggest a rapid increase of the galaxy IR comoving volume emissivity back to z~1 and a constant average emissivity at z>1. We also seem to find a difference in the evolution rate of the source number densities as a function of luminosity, a downsizing evolutionary pattern similar to that reported from other samples of cosmic sources.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.