Paper detail

Mid and Far-Infrared Color-Color Relations within Local Galaxies

We present an extensive archival analysis of a sample of local galaxies, combining multi-wavelength data from GALEX, Spitzer and Herschel to investigate "blue-side" mid-infrared (MIR) and "red-side" far-infrared (FIR) color-color correlations within the observed infrared spectral energy distributions (IR SEDs). Our sample largely consists of the KINGFISH galaxies, with the important addition of a select few including NGC5236 (M83) and NGC4449. With data from the far-ultraviolet FUV (${\sim}0.15$ $μ$m) through 500 $μ$m convolved to common angular resolution, we measure photometry of $kpc$-scale star-forming regions 36$"\times$36$"$ in size. Star formation rates (SFRs), stellar masses and metallicity distributions are derived throughout our sample. Focusing on the $f_{70}/f_{500}$ "FIR" and $f_{8}/f_{24}$ "MIR" flux density ratios (colors), we find that a sub-sample of galaxies demonstrate a strong IR color-color correlation within their star-forming regions, while others demonstrate uncorrelated colors. This division is driven by two main effects: 1) the local strength of star formation (SF) and 2) the metal content of the interstellar medium (ISM). Galaxies uniformly dominated by high surface densities of SF (e.g. NGC5236) demonstrate strong IR color-color correlations, while galaxies that exhibit lower levels of SF and mixed environments (e.g. NGC5457) demonstrate weaker or no correlation--explained by the increasing effect of varying ISM heating and metal content on the IR colors, specifically in the MIR. We find large dispersion in the SFR-$L_{8}$ (8 $μ$m luminosity) relation that is traced by the metallicity distributions, consistent with extant studies, highlighting its problematic use as a SFR indicator across diverse systems/samples.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.