Paper detail

Microwave Emission from the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt and the Asteroid Belt Constrained from WMAP

Objects in the Edgeworth-Kuiper belt and the main asteroid belt should emit microwaves that may give rise to extra anisotropy signals in the multipole of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) experiment. Constraints are derived from the absence of positive detection of such anisotropies for ell < 50, giving the total mass of Edgeworth-Kuiper belt objects to be smaller than 0.2 earth mass. This limit is consistent with the mass extrapolated from the observable population with the size of a > 15 km, assuming that the small-object population follows the power law in size dN/da ~ a^{-q} with the canonical index expected for collisional equilibrium, q ~ 3.5, with which 23% of the mass is ascribed to objects smaller than are observationally accessible down to grains. A similar argument applied to the main asteroid belt indicates that the grain population should not increase faster than q ~ 3.6 towards smaller radii, if it follows the power law continued to observed asteroids with larger radii. It is underlined that both cases are at or only slightly above the limit that can be physically significant, implying the importance of tightening further the CMB anisotropy limit, which may be attained with the observation at higher radio frequencies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.