Paper detail

Microstructural Characterization and Mechanical Property Evaluation of High Nitrogen Martensitic Stainless Steel Subjected to Heat Treatment

The High Nitrogen Martensitic Stainless Steel (HNMS) was subjected to three different austenitizing cycles of 1050$^\circ$C, 1075$^\circ$C and 1100$^\circ$C followed by subzero treatment at -70$^\circ$C. The fraction of retained austenite has been reduced after sub-zero treatment as revealed by microstructural evolution. The material was subsequently tempered at different temperatures ranging from 180$^\circ$C to 650$^\circ$C and the change in micro-structure, hardness, tensile strength and toughness were investigated after each heat treatment cycle. Optical microscopy, electron microscopy with EDS and X-Ray diffraction techniques were used to characterize the material. This has showed the constituents of microstructure were lath martensite, precipitated metal carbides of type $M_{23}C_6$, $M_7C_6$ and carbo-nitrides. Hardness, tensile testing and Charpy impact testing were carried to evaluate mechanical properties after the heat treatment which has showed the better mechanical properties for the samples solutionised at 1075$^\circ$C. Secondary hardening has been observed on tempering above 450$^\circ$C which can be attributed to the precipitation of secondary phase inter-metallic compounds. Hardness attains a peak value at peculiar temperature range after which it decreases on further tempering which is most likely because of the loss of coherency of the precipitates with the metal matrix. This has been further confirmed by the XRD of the specimens before and after tempering. The study stablishes the structure-property correlation of HNMS for different heat treatment cycles. The results indicate that a good combination of hardness and strength can be achieved after solutionizing at 1075$^\circ$C followed by double tempering at 525$^\circ$C.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.