Paper detail

Micrometer-sized ice particles for planetary-science experiments - I. Preparation, critical rolling friction force, and specific surface energy

Coagulation models assume a higher sticking threshold for micrometer-sized ice particles than for micrometer-sized silicate particles. However, in contrast to silicates, laboratory investigations of the collision properties of micrometer-sized ice particles (in particular, of the most abundant water ice) have not been conducted yet. Thus, we used two different experimental methods to produce micrometer-sized water ice particles, i. e. by spraying water droplets into liquid nitrogen and by spraying water droplets into a cold nitrogen atmosphere. The mean particle radii of the ice particles produced with these experimental methods are $(1.49 \pm 0.79) \, \mathrm{μm}$ and $(1.45 \pm 0.65) \, \mathrm{μm}$. Ice aggregates composed of the micrometer-sized ice particles are highly porous (volume filling factor: $ϕ= 0.11 \pm 0.01$) or rather compact (volume filling factor: $ϕ= 0.72 \pm 0.04$), depending on the method of production. Furthermore, the critical rolling friction force of $F_{Roll,ice}=(114.8 \pm 23.8) \times 10^{-10}\, \mathrm{N}$ was measured for micrometer-sized ice particles, which exceeds the critical rolling friction force of micrometer-sized $\mathrm{SiO_2}$ particles ($F_{Roll,SiO_2}=(12.1 \pm 3.6) \times 10^{-10}\, \mathrm{N}$). This result implies that the adhesive bonding between micrometer-sized ice particles is stronger than the bonding strength between $\mathrm{SiO_2}$ particles. An estimation of the specific surface energy of micrometer-sized ice particles, derived from the measured critical rolling friction forces and the surface energy of micrometer-sized $\mathrm{SiO_2}$ particles, results in $γ_{ice} = 0.190 \, \mathrm{J \, m^{-2}}$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.