Paper detail

Micromagnetics of shape anisotropy based permanent magnets

In the search for rare-earth free permanent magnets, various ideas related to shape anisotropy are being pursued. In this work we assess the limits of shape contributions to the reversal stability using micromagnetic simulations. In a first series of tests we altered the aspect ratio of single phase prolate spheroids from 1 to 16. Starting with a sphere of radius $4.3$ times the exchange length $ L_{\mathrm{ex}}$ we kept the total magnetic volume constant as the aspect ratio was modified. For a ferromagnet with zero magnetocrystalline anisotropy the maximum coercive field reached up to $0.5$ times the magnetization $M_{\mathrm{s}}$. Therefore, in materials with moderate uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy, the addition of shape anisotropy could even double the coercive field. Interestingly due to non-uniform magnetization reversal there is no significant increase of the coercive field for an aspect ratio greater than 5. A similar limit of the maximum aspect ratio was observed in cylinders. The coercive field depends on the wire diameter. By decreasing the wire diameter from $8.7 L_{\mathrm{ex}}$ to $2.2 L_{\mathrm{ex}}$ the coercive field increased by 40%. In the cylinders nucleation of a reversed domain starts at the corners at the end. Smoothing the edges can improve the coercive field by about 10%. In further simulations we compacted soft magnetic cylinders into a bulk-like arrangement. Misalignment and magnetostatic interactions cause a spread of $0.1 M_{\mathrm{s}}$ in the switching fields of the rods. Comparing the volume averaged hysteresis loops computed for isolated rods and the hysteresis loop computed for interacting rods, we conclude that magnetostatic interactions reduce the coercive field by up to 20%.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.