Paper detail

Microlensing towards the LMC: self lensing for OGLE-II and OGLE-III

We present an analysis of the results of the OGLE-III microlensing campaign towards the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). We evaluate for all the possible lens populations along the line of sight the expected microlensing quantities, number of events and duration. In particular we consider lensing by massive compact halo objects (MACHOs) in the dark matter haloes of both the Milky Way (MW) and the LMC, and "self lensing" by stars in the LMC bar and disc, in the MW disc and in the stellar haloes of both the LMC and the MW. As a result we find that the self-lensing signal is able to explain the 2 OGLE-III microlensing candidates. In particular, we estimate the expected MW disc signal to be almost as large as that from LMC stars and able, by itself, to explain the observed rate. We evaluate a 95% CL \emph{upper} limit for $f$, the halo mass fraction in form of MACHOs, in the range 10-20% for $(10^{-2}-0.5) \mathrm{M}_\odot$, and $f=24%$ for $1 \mathrm{M}_\odot$ (below 10% in this full range, and in particular below 5% for $(10^{-2}-0.1) \mathrm{M}_\odot$) for the Bright (All) samples of source stars. Furthermore, we find that these limits do not rise much even if we assume the observed events \emph{are} MACHOs. For the All sample we also evaluate a rather significant constraint on $f$ for larger values of the MACHO mass, in particular $f\sim 50%$ (95% CL) for $100 \mathrm{M}_\odot$, to date the stronger bound coming from microlensing analyses in this mass range. Finally, we discuss these results in the framework of the previous observational campaigns towards the LMC, that of the MACHO and the EROS collaborations, and we present a joint analysis of the OGLE-II and the OGLE-III campaigns.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.