Paper detail

Microlensing of pulsar radiation in the Galactic Center

We investigate the possibility of identifying massive objects (lenses) in the Galactic Center region (GC) by means of pulsar timing. The well known intensity change due to microlensing is found to be less important. For typical stellar masses, the flux magnification can be significant only if the lens passes very close to the pulsar--Earth axis. We show that in the case of a pulsar the time varying travel-time delay, which is observable because of the pulsating nature of pulsar radiation, is a much more powerful tool to investigate mass distributions in the GC. We find that a travel-time delay is measurable even for rather large distances between the lens and the pulsar--Earth axis. The time varying travel-time delay can be used to determine the mass of the lens and the ratio of the transverse velocity to the minimum impact parameter. Based on Monte Carlo simulations of synthetic data sets we give the expected accuracies in the parameter determination for various masses. We argue that pulsars found behind the very center of our Galaxy would provide an excellent opportunity to test the mass distribution in the Galactic nucleus, and therefore to distinguish between a super massive black hole (SMBH) and a super-dense star cluster (SDSC) within the central 0.1 pc.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.