Paper detail

Microlensing Induced Spectral Variability In Q2237+0305

Several macrolensed systems exhibit photometric variability consistent with microlensing due to objects of stellar mass located in the lens. The degree of microlensing amplification is dependent upon the size of the source, with smaller sources being more amplified. In general, amplification of sources larger than an Einstein radius projected onto the source plane is negligible. For the quasar Q2237+0305, a quadrupole image lens (Huchra et al., 1985), this radius is 0.05 pc, larger than the predicted size of a continuum emitting accretion disk, but substantially smaller than the broad line region (Figure 1). This scale difference implies that the continuum will be amplified while the broad line emission remains essentially unchanged during a microlensing event (Sanitt, 1971; Kayser et al., 1986). The broad line emitting region, as a whole, is too large to be microlensed, but substructure on small scales may be significantly amplified. Although the total flux in the line is relatively unchanged, microlensing of substructure can result in changes in the shape of the emission line profiles, and produce measurable shifts in the central wavelength of the line (Nemiroff, 1988; Schneider and Wambsganss, 1990).

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.