Paper detail

Microlensing by the Milky Way Halo

The measurements of the possible gravitational microlensing events are analysed with a simple yet accurate disc--halo model of the Milky Way Galaxy. This comprises a luminous exponential disc embedded in a flattened dark matter halo with density varying like ${\rm distance}^{-1.8}$. Including a disc has the important effect of lowering the implied masses of the dark matter objects. For the possible detection reported by Alcock et al (1993), the inferred mass of the lens lies in the range $\sim 0.01 - 0.15 M_\odot$. The candidate events of Aubourg et al (1993) have slightly larger implied masses of $\sim 0.025 - 0.35\ M_\odot$ and $\sim 0.03 - 0.45\ M_\odot$ respectively. These are consistent with the deflecters being either brown dwarfs or low mass stars. If there is no disc dark matter and the halo is completely composed of baryonic dark objects of typical mass $ \sim 0.08\ M_\odot$, then the monitoring of $1.8 \times 10^6$ stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud will provide at least $8-9$ detections a year, in the limit of $100 \%$ efficiency.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.