Paper detail

Microjets in the penumbra of a sunspot

Penumbral Microjets (PMJs) are short-lived jets found in the penumbra of sunspots, first observed in wide-band Ca H-line observations as localized brightenings, and are thought to be caused by magnetic reconnection. Earlier work on PMJs has been focused on smaller samples of by-eye selected events and case studies. It is our goal to present an automated study of a large sample of PMJs to place the basic statistics of PMJs on a sure footing and to study the PMJ Ca II 8542 Angstrom spectral profile in detail. High spatial resolution and spectrally well-sampled observations in the Ca II 8542 Angstrom line obtained from the Swedish 1-m Solar Telescope (SST) are reduced by a Principle Component Analysis and subsequently used in the automated detection of PMJs using the simple learning algorithm k-Nearest Neighbour. PMJ detections were verified with co-temporal Ca H-line observations. A total of 453 tracked PMJ events were found, or 4253 PMJs detections tallied over all timeframes and a detection rate of 21 events per timestep. From these, an average length, width and lifetime of 640 km, 210 km and 90 s were obtained. The average PMJ Ca II 8542 Angstrom line profile is characterized by enhanced inner wings, often in the form of one or two distinct peaks, and a brighter line core as compared to the quiet Sun average. Average blue and red peak positions were determined at -10.4 km/s and +10.2 km/s offsets from the Ca II 8542 Angstrom line core. We found several clusters of PMJ hotspots within the sunspot penumbra, where PMJ events occur in the same general area repeatedly over time. Our results indicate smaller average PMJs sizes and longer lifetimes compared to previously published values, but with statistics still in the same orders of magnitude. The investigation and analysis of the PMJ line profiles strengthen the proposed heating of PMJs to transition region temperatures.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.