Paper detail

MHD Accretion-Disk Winds as X-ray Absorbers in AGNs

We present the 2D ionization structure of self-similar MHD winds off accretion disks around irradiated by a central X-ray source. Based on earlier observational clues and theoretical arguments, we focus our attention on a subset of these winds, namely those with radial density dependence n(r)~1/r. We employ the photoionization code XSTAR to compute the ionic abundances of a large number of ions of different elements and then compile their line-of-sight (LOS) absorption columns. Particular attention is paid to the absorption measure distribution (AMD), namely their Hydrogen-equivalent column per logarithmic ionization parameter ξinterval, d N_H/(d \log ξ), which provides a measure of the winds' radial density profiles. For n(r)~1/r the AMD is found to be independent of ξ, in good agreement with its behavior inferred from the X-ray spectra of several AGNs. For the specific wind structure and X-ray spectrum we also compute detailed absorption line profiles for a number of ions to obtain their LOS velocities, v~100-300 km/sec (at \log ξ~2-3) for Fe XVII and v~1,000-4,000 km/sec (at \log ξ~4-5) for Fe XXV, in good agreement with the observation. Our models describe the X-ray absorption properties of these winds with only two parameters, namely the mass-accretion rate \dot{m} and LOS angle θ. The probability of obscuration of the X-ray ionizing source in these winds decreases with increasing \dot{m} and increases steeply with θ. As such, we concur with previous authors that these wind configurations, viewed globally, incorporate all the requisite properties of the parsec scale "torii" invoked in AGN unification schemes. We indicate that a combination of the AMD and absorption line profile observations can uniquely determine these model parameters and their bearing on AGN population demographics.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.