Paper detail

MgII Absorption at 2 < z < 6 with Magellan / FIRE. II: A Longitudinal Study of HI, Metals, and Ionization in Galactic Haloes

We present a detailed study of HI and metals for 110 MgII absorption systems discovered at 1.98 <= z <= 5.33 in the infrared spectra of high redshift QSOs. Using new measurements of rest-frame UV lines from optical spectra of the same targets, we compare the high redshift sample with carefully constructed low redshift control samples from the literature to study evolutionary trends from z=0 --> 5.33 (>12 Gyr). We observe a significant strengthening in the characteristic N(HI) for fixed MgII equivalent width as one moves toward higher redshift. Indeed at our sample's mean zbar=3.402, all MgII systems are either damped Ly-alpha absorbers or sub-DLAs, with 40.7% of systems exceeding the DLA threshold (compared to 16.7% at zbar=0.927). We set lower limits on the metallicity of the MgII systems where we can measure HI; these results are consistent with the full DLA population. The classical MgII systems (W(2796)=0.3-1.0 Ang), which preferentially associate with sub-DLAs, are quite metal rich at ~0.1 Solar. We applied quantitative classification metrics to our absorbers to compare with low redshift populations, finding that weak systems are similar to classic MgII absorbers at low redshift. The strong systems either have very large MgII and FeII velocity spreads implying non-virialized dynamics, or are more quiescent DLAs. There is tentative evidence that the kinetically complex systems evolve in similar fashion to the global star formation rate. We speculate that if weaker MgII systems represent accreting gas as suggested by recent studies of galaxy-absorber inclinations, then their high metal abundance suggests re-accretion of recently ejected material rather than first-time infall from the metal-poor IGM, even at early times.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.