Paper detail

Metrics for Quantifying Shareability in Transportation Networks: The Maximum Network Flow Overlap Problem

Cities around the world vary in terms of their transportation networks and travel demand patterns; these variations affect the viability of shared mobility services. This study proposes metrics to quantify the shareability of person-trips in a city, as a function of two inputs--the road network structure and origin-destination (OD) travel demand. The study first conceptualizes a fundamental shareability unit, 'flow overlap'. Flow overlap denotes, for a person-trip traversing a given path, the weighted (by link distance) average number of other trips sharing the links along the original person's path. The study extends this concept to the network level and formulates the Maximum Network Flow Overlap Problem (MNFLOP) to assign all OD trips to paths that maximize network-wide flow overlap. The study utilizes the MNFLOP output to calculate metrics of shareability at various levels of aggregation: person-trip level, OD level, origin or destination level, network level, and link level. The study applies the MNFLOP and associated shareability metrics to different OD demand scenarios in the Sioux Falls network. The computational results verify that (i) MNFLOP assigns person-trips to paths such that flow overlaps significantly increase relative to shortest path assignment, (ii) MNFLOP and its associated shareability metrics can meaningfully differentiate between different OD trip matrices in terms of shareability, and (iii) an MNFLOP-based metric can quantify demand dispersion--a metric of the directionality of demand--in addition to the magnitude of demand, for trips originating or terminating from a single node in the network. The paper also includes an extensive discussion of potential future uses of the MNFLOP and its associated shareability metrics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.