Paper detail

Metrical theorems on systems of affine forms

In this paper we discuss metric theory associated with the affine (inhomogeneous) linear forms in the so called doubly metric settings within the classical and the mixed setups. We consider the system of affine forms given by $\qq\mapsto \qq X+\bfalpha$, where $\qq\in\Z^m$ (viewed as a row vector), $X$ is an $m\times n$ real matrix and $\bfalpha\in \R^n$. The classical setting refers to the ${\rm dist}(\qq X+\bfalpha, \Z^m)$ to measure the closeness of the integer values of the system $(X, \bfalpha)$ to integers. The absolute value setting is obtained by replacing ${\rm dist}(\qq X+\bfalpha, \Z^m)$ with ${\rm dist}(\qq X+\bfalpha, \0)$; and the more general mixed settings are obtained by replacing ${\rm dist}(\qq X+\bfalpha, \Z^m)$ with ${\rm dist}(\qq X+\bfalpha, Λ)$, where $Λ$ is a subgroup of $\Z^m$. We prove the Khintchine--Groshev and Jarník type theorems for the mixed affine forms and Jarník type theorem for the classical affine forms. We further prove that the sets of badly approximable affine forms, in both the classical and mixed settings, are hyperplane winning. The latter result, for the classical setting, answers a question raised by Kleinbock (1999).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.