Paper detail

Metric-Guided Feature Fusion of Visual Foundation Models for Segmentation Tasks

Although large-scale visual foundation models (VFMs) achieve remarkable performance in semantic understanding, they still underperform in instance-aware dense prediction tasks. They exhibit different biases in representation: for instance, promptable segmentation models (e.g., SAM2) focus on fine-grained region boundaries, while self-supervised models (e.g., DINOv3) emphasize object-level structure. This observation highlights the potential of combining complementary features from different VFMs to enhance downstream dense prediction tasks. However, naive multi-VFM fusion seldom leads to reliable gains, and interpretable principles for leveraging their complementary features are still underexplored. In this work, we propose a metric-guided approach that effectively selects and aggregates complementary features from different VFMs based on explicit assessment scores. Specifically, we design a suite of label-free metrics in feature space across two aspects, Structural Coherence and Edge Fidelity, to assess features of VFM encoders. Guided by these scores, we identify complementary edge-strong and structure-strong encoder pairs, and integrate them via a master-auxiliary fusion scheme. This feature fusion requires no complex architectural changes and is trained only in a single stage. Our model shows consistent performance gains across multiple dense prediction tasks compared with the baselines, with better object-level semantics and more accurately localized boundaries. The code is available at {https://github.com/gyc-code/metric-guided-fusion}.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.