Paper detail

Metric Decompositions of Path-Separable Graphs

A prominent tool in many problems involving metric spaces is a notion of randomized low-diameter decomposition. Loosely speaking, $β$-decomposition refers to a probability distribution over partitions of the metric into sets of low diameter, such that nearby points (parameterized by $β>0$) are likely to be "clustered" together. Applying this notion to the shortest-path metric in edge-weighted graphs, it is known that $n$-vertex graphs admit an $O(\ln n)$-padded decomposition (Bartal, 1996), and that excluded-minor graphs admit $O(1)$-padded decomposition (Klein, Plotkin and Rao 1993, Fakcharoenphol and Talwar 2003, Abraham et al. 2014). We design decompositions to the family of $p$-path-separable graphs, which was defined by Abraham and Gavoille (2006). and refers to graphs that admit vertex-separators consisting of at most $p$ shortest paths in the graph. Our main result is that every $p$-path-separable $n$-vertex graph admits an $O(\ln (p \ln n))$-decomposition, which refines the $O(\ln n)$ bound for general graphs, and provides new bounds for families like bounded-treewidth graphs. Technically, our clustering process differs from previous ones by working in (the shortest-path metric of) carefully chosen subgraphs.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.