Paper detail

Methods of computing deque sortable permutations given complete and incomplete information

The problem of determining which permutations can be sorted using certain switchyard networks dates back to Knuth in 1968. In this work, we are interested in permutations which are sortable on a double-ended queue (called a deque), or on two parallel stacks. In 1982, Rosenstiehl and Tarjan presented an O(n) algorithm for testing whether a given permutation was sortable on parallel stacks. In the same paper, they also presented a modification giving O(n) test for sortability on a deque. We demonstrate a slight error in the version of their algorithm for testing deque sortability, and present a fix for this problem. The general enumeration problem for both of these classes of permutations remains unsolved. What is known is that the growth rate of both classes is approximately Theta(8^n), so computing the number of sortable permutations of length n, even for small values of n, is difficult to do using any method that must evaluate each sortable permutation individually. As far as we know, the number of deque sortable permutations was known only up to n=14. This was computed using algorithms which effectively generate all sortable permutations. By using the symmetries inherent in the execution of Tarjan's algorithm, we have developed a new dynamic programming algorithm which can count the number of sortable permutations in both classes in O(n^5 2^n) time, allowing the calculation of the number of deque and parallel stack sortable permutation for much higher values of n than was previously possible.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.