Paper detail

Metastability Triggered Reactivity in Clusters at Realistic Conditions: A Case Study of N-doped (TiO$_2$)$_n$ for Photocatalysis

Here we report a strategy, by taking a prototypical model system for photocatalysis (viz. N-doped (TiO$_2$)$_n$ clusters), to accurately determine low energy metastable structures that can play a major role with enhanced catalytic reactivity. Computational design of specific metastable photocatalyst with enhanced activity is never been easy due to plenty of isomers on potential energy surface. This requires fixing various parameters viz. (i) favorable formation energy, (ii) low fundamental gap, (iii) low excitation energy and (iv) high vertical electron affinity (VEA) and low vertical ionization potential (VIP). We validate here by integrating several first principles based methodologies that consideration of the global minimum structure alone can severely underestimate the activity. As a first step, we have used a suite of genetic algorithms [viz. searching clusters with conventional minimum total energy ((GA)$_\textrm{E}$); searching clusters with specific property i.e. high VEA ((GA)$_\textrm{P}^{\textrm{EA}}$), and low VIP ((GA)$_\textrm{P}^{\textrm{IP}}$)] to model the N-doped (TiO$_2$)$_n$ clusters. Following this, we have identified its free energy using ab initio thermodynamics to confirm that the metastable structures are not too far from the global minima. By analyzing a large dataset, we find that N-substitution ((N)$_\textrm{O}$) prefers to reside at highly coordinated oxygen site to maximize its coordination, whereas N-interstitial ((NO)$_\textrm{O}$) and split-interstitial ((N$_2)_\textrm{O}$) favor the dangling oxygen site. Interestingly, we notice that each types of defect (viz. substitution, interstitials) reduce the fundamental gap and excitation energy substantially. However, (NO)$_\textrm{O}$ and (N$_2)_\textrm{O}$ doped clusters are the potential candidates for overall water splitting, whereas N$_\textrm{O}$ is congenial only for oxygen evolution reaction.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.