Paper detail

Metal Lines in Cosmological Models of Lyman-Alpha Absorbers

The metal absorption lines found in association with \lya absorbers of moderate to high HI column density contain valuable information about the metallicity and ionization conditions within the absorbers and offer a stronger test of models of the intergalactic medium at \sim 3$ than HI absorption lines alone. We have developed a method to predict the strengths of metal absorption lines within the framework of cosmological models for the \lya forest. The method consists of evaluating a quantity, the Line Observability Index, for a database of hundreds of candidate metal lines, allowing a comprehensive identification of the lines the model predicts to be detectable associated with a \lya absorber of a given HI column density and metallicity. Applying this technique to a particular class of models at \sim 2-4$, we predict that the OVI(1032 Å, 1038 Å) doublet is the only practical probe of the metallicity of low column density absorbers (HI \simlt 10^{14.5} cm^{-2}$), that CIV (1548 Å) is the strongest line with rest wavelength $λ_r > 1216$ Å regardless of HI$, and that the strongest metal lines should be CIII(977 Å) and SiIII(1206.5 Å), which peak at HI \sim 10^{17} cm^{-2}$.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.