Paper detail

MetaFEM: A Generic FEM Solver By Meta-expressions

Current multi-physics Finite Element Method (FEM) solvers are complex systems in terms of both their mathematical complexity and lines of code. This paper proposes a skeleton generic FEM solver, named MetaFEM, in total about 5,000 lines of Julia code, which translates generic input Partial Differential Equation (PDE) weak forms into corresponding GPU-accelerated simulations with a grammar similar to FEniCS or FreeFEM. Two novel approaches differentiate MetaFEM from the common solvers: (1) the FEM kernel is based on an original theory/algorithm which explicitly processes meta-expressions, as the name suggests, and (2) the symbolic engine is a rule-based Computer Algebra System (CAS), i.e., the equations are rewritten/derived according to a set of rewriting rules instead of going through completely fixed routines, supporting easy customization by developers. Example cases in thermal conduction, linear elasticity and incompressible flow are presented to demonstrate utility.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.