Paper detail

Meta-local density functionals: a new rung on Jacob's ladder

The homogeneous electron gas (HEG) is a key ingredient in the construction of most exchange-correlation functionals of density-functional theory. Often, the energy of the HEG is parameterized as a function of its spin density $n$, leading to the local density approximation (LDA) for inhomogeneous systems. However, the connection between the electron density and kinetic energy density of the HEG can be used to generalize the LDA by evaluating it on a weighted geometric average of the local spin density and the spin density of a HEG that has the local kinetic energy density of the inhomogeneous system, with a mixing ratio $x$. This leads to a new family of functionals that we term meta-local density approximations (meta-LDAs), which are still exact for the HEG, which are derived only from properties of the HEG, and which form a new rung of Jacob's ladder of density functionals. The first functional of this ladder, the local $τ$ approximation (LTA) of Ernzerhof and Scuseria that corresponds to $x=1$ is unfortunately not stable enough to be used in self-consistent field calculations, because it leads to divergent potentials as we show in this work. However, a geometric averaging of the LDA and LTA densities with smaller values of $x$ not only leads to numerical stability of the resulting functional, but also yields more accurate exchange energies in atomic calculations than the LDA, the LTA, or the tLDA functional ($x=1/4$) of Eich and Hellgren. We choose $x=0.50$ as it gives the best total energy in self-consistent exchange-only calculations for the argon atom. Atomization energy benchmarks confirm that the choice $x=0.50$ also yields improved energetics in combination with correlation functionals in molecules, almost eliminating the well-known overbinding of the LDA and reducing its error by two thirds.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.