Paper detail

Message Authentication Code over a Wiretap Channel

Message Authentication Code (MAC) is a keyed function $f_K$ such that when Alice, who shares the secret $K$ with Bob, sends $f_K(M)$ to the latter, Bob will be assured of the integrity and authenticity of $M$. Traditionally, it is assumed that the channel is noiseless. However, Maurer showed that in this case an attacker can succeed with probability $2^{-\frac{H(K)}{\ell+1}}$ after authenticating $\ell$ messages. In this paper, we consider the setting where the channel is noisy. Specifically, Alice and Bob are connected by a discrete memoryless channel (DMC) $W_1$ and a noiseless but insecure channel. In addition, an attacker Oscar is connected with Alice through DMC $W_2$ and with Bob through a noiseless channel. In this setting, we study the framework that sends $M$ over the noiseless channel and the traditional MAC $f_K(M)$ over channel $(W_1, W_2)$. We regard the noisy channel as an expensive resource and define the authentication rate $ρ_{auth}$ as the ratio of message length to the number $n$ of channel $W_1$ uses. The security of this framework depends on the channel coding scheme for $f_K(M)$. A natural coding scheme is to use the secrecy capacity achieving code of Csiszár and Körner. Intuitively, this is also the optimal strategy. However, we propose a coding scheme that achieves a higher $ρ_{auth}.$ Our crucial point for this is that in the secrecy capacity setting, Bob needs to recover $f_K(M)$ while in our coding scheme this is not necessary. How to detect the attack without recovering $f_K(M)$ is the main contribution of this work. We achieve this through random coding techniques.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.