Paper detail

Mesoscopic Energy Ranking Constraints in the IllustrisTNG Simulations

We revisited the problem of mixing in a gravitational N-body system from the point of view of the ordering of coarse-grained cells in the one-particle energy space, here denoted {\it energy ranking preservation} (ERP). This effect has been noted for some time in simulations, although individual particle energies and their phase-space variables mix considerably. The present investigation aimed to map ERP in terms of parameters involving the collective range in which it is effective, as well as in terms of global and historical characterisations of gravitational systems evolving towards equilibrium. We examined a subset of the IllustrisTNG cosmological magnetohydrodynamical simulations (TNG50-4 and TNG100-3), considering both their full and dark-only versions. For each simulation, we selected the $20$ most massive haloes at redshift $z=0$, tracing their ERP fractions back at selected redshift markers ({\tt z} $= \{1.0, 5.0, 10.0 \}$), and for a coarse-graining set ranging from $5$ to $30$ energy bins. At the redshift marker {\tt z} $= 1$, we found high ERP fractions (above $\sim 80 \%$) in both simulations, regardless of the coarse-graining level. The {\it decline} in ERP fractions with redshift was roughly a function of mass and fractional mass increase in the analysed TNG50-4 haloes, but not in the TNG100-3 ones, indicating a possible relative susceptibility of the ERP effect to mass accretion for haloes less massive than $\sim 10^{14} ~ M_{\odot}$. We confirmed earlier indications in the literature concerning a possible "mesoscopic" constraint operative in a time span of at least several Gyr.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.