Paper detail

Mesh-independent a priori bounds for nonlinear elliptic finite difference boundary value problems

In this paper we prove mesh independent a priori $L^\infty$-bounds for positive solutions of the finite difference boundary value problem $$ -Δ_h u = f(x,u) \mbox{ in } Ω_h, \quad u=0 \mbox{ on } \partialΩ_h, $$ where $Δ_h$ is the finite difference Laplacian and $Ω_h$ is a discretized $n$-dimensional box. On one hand this completes a result of [10] on the asympotic symmetry of solutions of finite difference boundary value problems. On the other hand it is a finite difference version of a critical exponent problem studied in [11]. Two main results are given: one for dimension $n=1$ and one for the higher dimensional case $n\geq 2$. The methods of proof differ substantially in these two cases. In the 1-dimensional case our method resembles ode-techniques. In the higher dimensional case the growth rate of the nonlinearity has to be bounded by an exponent $p<\frac{n}{n-1}$ where we believe that $\frac{n}{n-1}$ plays the role of a critical exponent. Our method in this case is based on the use of the discrete Hardy-Sobolev inequality as in [3] and on Moser&#39;s iteration method. We point out that our a priori bounds are (in principal) explicit.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.