Paper detail

MERLIN -- Malware Evasion with Reinforcement LearnINg

In addition to signature-based and heuristics-based detection techniques, machine learning (ML) is widely used to generalize to new, never-before-seen malicious software (malware). However, it has been demonstrated that ML models can be fooled by tricking the classifier into returning the incorrect label. These studies, for instance, usually rely on a prediction score that is fragile to gradient-based attacks. In the context of a more realistic situation where an attacker has very little information about the outputs of a malware detection engine, modest evasion rates are achieved. In this paper, we propose a method using reinforcement learning with DQN and REINFORCE algorithms to challenge two state-of-the-art ML-based detection engines (MalConv \& EMBER) and a commercial AV classified by Gartner as a leader AV. Our method combines several actions, modifying a Windows portable execution (PE) file without breaking its functionalities. Our method also identifies which actions perform better and compiles a detailed vulnerability report to help mitigate the evasion. We demonstrate that REINFORCE achieves very good evasion rates even on a commercial AV with limited available information.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.