Paper detail

Merging white dwarfs and SN Ia

Using population synthesis, we study a double-degenerate (DD) scenario for SNe Ia, aiming to estimate the maximum possible contribution to the rate of SNe from this scenario and the dependence of the delay-time distribution (DTD) on it. We make an extreme assumption that all mergers of super-Chandrasekhar pairs of CO white dwarfs (WDs) and mergers of CO WDs more massive than 0.47 $M_\odot$ with hybrid or helium WDs more massive than 0.37$M_\odot$ produce SNe Ia. The models are parametrized by the product of the common envelope efficiency and the parameter of binding energy of stellar envelopes $α_{ce}λ$, which we vary between 0.25 and 2. The best agreement with observations is obtained for $α_{ce}λ$=2. A substantial contribution to the rate of SNe Ia is provided by the pairs with a hybrid WD. The estimated Galactic rate of SNe Ia is $6.5 10^{-3}$ per yr (for the mass of the bulge and thin disk equal to $7.2 10^{10} M_\odot$), which is comparable to the observational estimate $(5.4\pm0.12) 10^{-3}$ per yr. The model DTD for 1 to 8 Gyr range satisfactorily fits DTD for SNe Ia in the field galaxies (Maoz et al. 2012). For this epoch, model DTD is a power low with an index -1.64. At earlier and later epochs our DTD has a deficit of events, as in other studies. Marginal agreement with observational DTD is achieved even if only CO+CO WD with $M_1\geq0.8\,M_\odot$ and $M_2\geq0.6\,M_\odot$ produce SNe Ia. A better agreement of observed and model DTD may be obtained if tidal effects are weaker than assumed and/or metallicity of population is much lower than solar.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.