Paper detail

Merging Sorted Lists of Similar Strings

Merging $T$ sorted, non-redundant lists containing $M$ elements into a single sorted, non-redundant result of size $N \ge M/T$ is a classic problem typically solved practically in $O(M \log T)$ time with a priority-queue data structure the most basic of which is the simple *heap*. We revisit this problem in the situation where the list elements are *strings* and the lists contain many *identical or nearly identical elements*. By keeping simple auxiliary information with each heap node, we devise an $O(M \log T+S)$ worst-case method that performs no more character comparisons than the sum of the lengths of all the strings $S$, and another $O(M \log (T/ \bar e)+S)$ method that becomes progressively more efficient as a function of the fraction of equal elements $\bar e = M/N$ between input lists, reaching linear time when the lists are all identical. The methods perform favorably in practice versus an alternate formulation based on a trie.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.