Merging galaxies produce outliers from the Fundamental Metallicity Relation

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

From a large sample of ≈170,000\approx 170,000 local SDSS galaxies, we find that the Fundamental Metallicity Relation (FMR) has an overabundance of outliers, compared to what would be expected from a Gaussian distribution of residuals, with significantly lower metallicities than predicted from their stellar mass and star formation rate (SFR). This low-metallicity population has lower stellar masses, bimodial specific SFRs with enhanced star formation within the aperture and smaller half-light radii than the general sample, and is hence a physically distinct population. We show that they are consistent with being galaxies that are merging or have recently merged with a satellite galaxy. In this scenario, low-metallicity gas flows in from large radii, diluting the metallicity of star-forming regions and enhancing the specific SFR until the inflowing gas is processed and the metallicity has recovered. We introduce a simple model in which mergers with a mass ratio larger than a minimum dilute the central galaxy's metallicity by an amount that is proportional to the stellar mass ratio for a constant time, and show that it provides an excellent fit to the distribution of FMR residuals. We find the dilution time-scale to be τ=1.568−0.027+0.029τ=1.568_{-0.027}^{+0.029} Gyr, the average metallicity depression caused by a 1:1 merger to be α=0.2480−0.0020+0.0017α=0.2480_{-0.0020}^{+0.0017} dex and the minimum mass ratio merger that can be discerned from the intrinsic Gaussian scatter in the FMR to be ξmin=0.2030−0.0095+0.0127ξ_\text{min}=0.2030_{-0.0095}^{+0.0127} (these are statistical errors only). From this we derive that the average metallicity depression caused by a merger with mass ratio between 1:5 and 1:1 is 0.114 dex.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.