Paper detail

Merging black hole binaries in galactic nuclei: implications for advanced-LIGO detections

Motivated by the recent detection of gravitational waves from the black hole binary merger GW150914, we study the dynamical evolution of black holes in galactic nuclei where massive star clusters reside. With masses of ~10^7M_Sun and sizes of only a few parsecs, nuclear star clusters are the densest stellar systems observed in the local universe and represent a robust environment where (stellar mass) black hole binaries can dynamically form, harden and merge. We show that due to their large escape speeds, nuclear star clusters can keep a large fraction of their merger remnants while also evolving rapidly enough that the holes can sink back to the central regions where they can swap in new binaries that can subsequently harden and merge. This process can repeat several times and produce black hole mergers of several tens of solar masses similar to GW150914 and up to a few hundreds of solar masses, without the need of invoking extremely low metallicity environments or implausible initial conditions. We use a semi-analytical approach to describe the formation and dynamics of black holes in massive star clusters. We find a black hole binary merger rate per volume from nuclear star clusters of ~1.5 Gpc^-3 yr^-1, implying up to a few tens of possible detections per year with Advanced LIGO. Our models suggest a local merger rate of 0.3- 1 Gpc^-3 yr^-1 for high mass black hole binaries similar to GW150914 (total mass >~ 50 M_Sun, redshift z< 0.3); a merger rate comparable to that of high mass black hole binaries that are dynamically assembled in globular clusters. Finally, we show that if all black holes receive high natal kicks, >~50km s^-1, then nuclear star clusters could dominate the local merger rate of binary black holes compared to the merger rate of similar binaries produced in either globular clusters or through isolated binary evolution.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.