Paper detail

Mergers and Galaxy Evolution (Sept94 Ringberg Workshop)

Galaxy merging is the late time manifestation of the galaxy formation process and likely significantly effects $z<1$ galaxies. A ``maximum reasonable rate'' model for merging finds a $\sim2$ mag K band increase in the luminosities of dwarf galaxies so that they contribute significantly to the faint counts, with spirals and ellipticals being far less affected. The median $K$ and $I$ redshifts stabilize (and even decrease slightly) at $z\simeq0.6$ beyond I=21 or K=19. The B redshifts continue to rise (although strongly dependent on the UV spectral evolution). Such rapid merging predicts that at $z=1$ the characteristic galaxy mass is reduced to $\sim30\%$ of the $z=0$ value. To rule out this model requires good sampling beyond $z=1$. A theoretical complication for even a minimal merger rate, which reduces $z=1$ masses to 2/3 of current epoch values, is that infall of a single satellite having 10\% of a disk's mass may destroy thin disks. Using completely self-consistent n-body simulations, we show that the primary response of a disk to ``cosmological'' satellites up to 20\% of the disk mass is to {\em tilt} the disk with a temporary warping.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.