Paper detail

Merger rate density of stellar-mass binary black holes from young massive clusters, open clusters, and isolated binaries: comparisons with LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA results

I investigate the roles of cluster dynamics and massive binary evolution in producing stellar-remnant binary black hole (BBH) mergers over the cosmic time. To that end, dynamical BBH mergers are obtained from long-term direct N-body evolutionary models of $\sim10^4M_\odot$, pc-scale young massive clusters (YMC) evolving into moderate-mass open clusters (OC). Fast evolutionary models of massive isolated binaries (IB) yield BBHs from binary evolution. Population synthesis in a Model Universe is then performed, taking into account observed cosmic star-formation and enrichment histories, to obtain BBH-merger yields from these two channels observable at the present day and over cosmic time. The merging BBH populations from the two channels are combined by applying a proof-of-concept Bayesian regression chain, taking into account observed differential intrinsic BBH merger rate densities from the second gravitational-wave transient catalogue (GWTC-2). The analysis estimates an OB-star binary fraction of $f_{\rm Obin}\gtrsim90$% and a YMC formation efficiency of $f_{\rm YMC}\sim10^{-2}$, being consistent with recent optical observations and large scale structure formation simulations. The corresponding combined Model Universe present-day, differential intrinsic BBH merger rate density and the cosmic evolution of BBH merger rate density both agree well with those from GWTC-2. The analysis also suggests that despite significant 'dynamical mixing' at low redshifts, BBH mergers at high redshifts ($z_{\rm event}\gtrsim1$) could still be predominantly determined by binary-evolution physics. Caveats in the present approach and future improvements are discussed.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.