Paper detail

Merger Histories of Galaxy Halos and Implications for Disk Survival

We study the merger histories of galaxy dark matter halos using a high resolution LCDM N-body simulation. Our merger trees follow ~17,000 halos with masses M_0 = (10^11--10^13) Msun at z=0 and track accretion events involving objects as small as m = 10^10 Msun. We find that mass assembly is remarkably self-similar in m/M_0, and dominated by mergers that are ~10% of the final halo mass. While very large mergers, m > 0.4 M_0, are quite rare, sizeable accretion events, m ~ 0.1 M_0, are common. Over the last 10 Gyr, an overwhelming majority (~95%) of Milky Way-sized halos with M_0 = 10^12 Msun have accreted at least one object with greater total mass than the Milky Way disk (m > 5x10^10 Msun), and approximately 70% have accreted an object with more than twice that mass (m > 10^11 Msun). Our results raise serious concerns about the survival of thin-disk dominated galaxies within the current paradigm for galaxy formation in a CDM universe. In order to achieve a ~70% disk-dominated fraction in Milky Way-sized CDM halos, mergers involving m ~ 2x10^11 Msun objects must not destroy disks. Considering that most thick disks and bulges contain old stellar populations, the situation is even more restrictive: these mergers must not heat disks or drive gas into their centers to create young bulges.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.