Paper detail

Merger Criteria of Multiple Massive Black Holes and the Impact on the Host Galaxy

We perform N-body simulations on a multiple massive black hole (MBH) system in a host galaxy to derive the criteria for successive MBH merger. The calculations incorporate the dynamical friction by stars and general relativistic effects as pericentre shift and gravitational wave recoil. The orbits of MBHs are pursed down to ten Schwarzschild radii (~ 1 AU). As a result, it is shown that about a half of MBHs merge during 1 Gyr in a galaxy with mass $10^{11}M_{\odot}$ and stellar velocity dispersion 240 km/s, even if the recoil velocity is two times as high as the stellar velocity dispersion. The dynamical friction allows a binary MBH to interact frequently with other MBHs, and then the decay of the binary orbits leads to the merger through gravitational wave radiation, as shown by Tanikawa & Umemura (2011). We derive the MBH merger criteria for the masses, sizes, and luminosities of host galaxies. It is found that the successive MBH mergers are expected in bright galaxies, depending on redshifts. Furthermore, we find that the central stellar density is reduced by the sling-shot mechanism and that high-velocity stars with ~ 1000 km/s are generated intermittently in extremely radial orbits.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.