Paper detail

Merger by Migration at the Final Phase of Common Envelope Evolution

I find the common envelope (CE) energy formalism, the CE α-prescription, to be inadequate to predict the final orbital separation of the CE evolution in massive envelopes. I find that when the orbital separation decreases to ~10 times the final orbital separation predicted by the CE α-prescription, the companion has not enough mass in its vicinity to carry away its angular momentum. The core-secondary binary system must get rid of its angular momentum by interacting with mass further out. The binary system interacts gravitationally with a rapidly-rotating flat envelope, in a situation that resembles planet-migration in protoplanetary disks. The envelope convection of the giant carries energy and angular momentum outward. The basic assumption of the CE α-prescription, that the binary system's gravitational energy goes to unbind the envelope, breaks down. Based on that, I claim that merger is a common outcome of the CE evolution of AGB and red super-giants stars with an envelope to secondary mass ratio of (M_env/M_2)>~5. I discuss some other puzzling observations that might be explained by the migration and merger processes.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.