Paper detail

Memory-Rate Tradeoff for Caching with Uncoded Placement under Nonuniform File Popularity

For caching with nonuniform file popularity, we aim to characterize the memory-rate tradeoff under uncoded cache placement. We consider the recently proposed Modified Coded Caching Scheme (MCCS) with the optimized cache placement based on the popularity-first approach to minimize the average delivery rate. We introduce two information-theoretic lower bounds on the average rate for caching under uncoded placement. For $K = 2$ users, we show that the optimized MCCS attains the lower bound and is optimal for caching with uncoded placement. For general $K$ users with distinct file requests, the optimized MCCS attains the popularity-first-based lower bound. When there are redundant file requests among $K$ users, we show a possible gap between the optimized MCCS and the lower bounds, which is attributed to zero-padding commonly used for coded delivery. We analyze the impact of zero-padding and its limitation. Simulation study shows that the loss is very small in general and only exists in some limited cases.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.