Paper detail

Membership Inference Attacks on Knowledge Graphs

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) infer whether a specific data record is used for target model training. MIAs have provoked many discussions in the information security community since they give rise to severe data privacy issues, especially for private and sensitive datasets. Knowledge Graphs (KGs), which describe domain-specific subjects and relationships among them, are valuable and sensitive, such as medical KGs constructed from electronic health records. However, the privacy threat to knowledge graphs is critical but rarely explored. In this paper, we conduct the first empirical evaluation of privacy threats to knowledge graphs triggered by knowledge graph embedding methods (KGEs). We propose three types of membership inference attacks: transfer attacks (TAs), prediction loss-based attacks (PLAs), and prediction correctness-based attacks (PCAs), according to attack difficulty levels. In the experiments, we conduct three inference attacks against four standard KGE methods over three benchmark datasets. In addition, we also propose the attacks against medical KG and financial KG. The results demonstrate that the proposed attack methods can easily explore the privacy leakage of knowledge graphs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.