Paper detail

Melting/freezing transition in polydisperse Lennard-Jones system: Remarkable agreement between predictions of inherent structure, bifurcation phase diagram, Hansen-Verlet rule and Lindemann criteria

We use polydispersity in size as a control parameter to explore certain aspects of melting and freezing transitions in a system of Lennard-Jones spheres. Both analytical theory and computer simulations are employed to establish a potentially interesting relationship between observed terminal polydispersity in Lennard-Jones polydisperse spheres and prediction of the same in the integral equation based theoretical analysis of liquid-solid transition. As we increase polydispersity, solid becomes inherently unstable because of the strain built up due to the size disparity. This aspect is studied here by calculating the inherent structure (IS) calculation. With polydispersity at constant volume fraction we find initially a sharp rise of the average IS energy of the crystalline solid until transition polydispersity, followed by a cross over to a weaker dependence of IS energy on polydispersity in the amorphous state. This cross over from FCC to amorphous state predicted by IS analysis agrees remarkably well with the solid-liquid phase diagram (with extension into the metastable phase) generated by non-linear integral equation theories of freezing. Two other well-known criteria of freezing/melting transitions, the Hansen-Verlet rule of freezing and the Lindemann criterion of melting are both shown to be remarkably in good agreement with the above two estimates. Together they seem to indicate a small range of metastability in the liquid-solid transition in polydisperse solids.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.