Paper detail

Melting curve of magnesium up to 460 GPa from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations

Based on ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, we determined the melting curve of magnesium (Mg) up to ~460 GPa using the solid-liquid coexistence method. Between ~30 and 100 GPa, our melting curve is noticeably lower than those from static experiments, but is in good agreement with recent shock experiments. Up to ~450 GPa, our melting curve is generally consistent with the melting points from first-principles calculations using the small-cell coexistence method. We found that, at high pressures of a few hundred GPa, due to the strong softening of interatomic interactions in the liquid phase, solid-liquid coexistence simulations of Mg show some characteristics distinctively different from other metal systems, such as aluminum. For example, at a given volume, the pressure and temperature range for maintaining a stable solid-liquid coexistence state can be very small. The strong softening in the liquid phase also causes the unusual behavior of reentrant melting to occur at very high pressures. The onset of reentrant melting is predicted at ~305 GPa, close to that at ~300 GPa from the small-cell coexistence method. We show that the calculated melting points, considering reentrant melting, can be excellently fitted to a low-order Kechin equation, thereby making it possible for us to obtain a first-principles melting curve of Mg at pressures above 50 GPa for the first time. Similar characteristics in solid-liquid coexistence simulations, as well as reentrant melting, are also expected for other systems with strong softening in the liquid phase at high pressures.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.